* Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> On 3/6/17 03:33, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Would this be a candidate for backpatching, or is the behaviour change
> > in pg_dump trumping the issues it solves?
>
> Unless someone literally has a materialized view on pg_policy, it
> wouldn't make a difference, so I'm not very keen on bothering to
> backpatch this.
Agreed.
Thanks!
Stephen