Re: [HACKERS] [BUG FIX] Removing NamedLWLockTrancheArray
От | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [BUG FIX] Removing NamedLWLockTrancheArray |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170303.173119.145303756.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [BUG FIX] Removing NamedLWLockTrancheArray (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I should be very tired. This is the last mail today. At Fri, 03 Mar 2017 17:26:27 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote in <20170303.172627.225604431.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> > > > Hello, some of my collegues found that orafce crashes with > > > postgresql compliled with dtrace. > > > > > > === The cause > > > > > > The immediate cause was I think that it just did > > > LWLockNewTrancheId and forget to do LWLockRegisterTranche. But > > > this is hardly detectable by a module developer. > > > > I'm sorry, I found that orafce is calling LWLockRegisterTranche > > so this might be a different problem but anyway the problem with > > RequestNamedLWLockTranche occurs. > > As for orafce, the real cuase seems to be calling > LWLockRagisterTranche with tranche on non-static memory. No, it is giving static variable. Sorry for the noise. The problem of postgresql is still exists, though. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: