Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE command progress checker

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:28:23AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-03-01 10:25:49 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > We now have a framework for this [1] (currently used by vacuum, but
> > extensible). The question is about presentation.  I'm fairly sure that
> > we shouldn't just add yet another framework, and I doubt that that's
> > what's proposed by Peter.
> > 
> > [1]
> > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=c16dc1aca5e
> 
> Majority of that is actually in
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=b6fb6471f6afaf649e52f38269fd8c5c60647669

If that's even vaguely usable, I'd say we should use it for this.

I notice that that commit has no SGML component.  Should it have one?

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate