Re: [HACKERS] rename pg_log directory?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] rename pg_log directory? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170228030115.GG11339@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] rename pg_log directory? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] rename pg_log directory?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:51:26AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > How about changing the default for log_directory from 'pg_log' to, say, > > 'log'? > > > We have been emphasizing that the prefix "pg_" is for things reserved to > > PostgreSQL, whereas the pg_log directory is entirely an arbitrary > > user-space name. Also, with a different name, the directory would stand > > out more between all the other pg_* directories in the data directory. > > No objection to the basic point, but "log" seems perhaps a little too > generic to me. Would something like "server_log" be better? "activity_log"? I like the idea of a rename. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: