Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators

On 2017-02-27 18:04:41 +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 27/02/17 18:00, Andres Freund wrote:
> > 
> >> FWIW I think the ppc64 machines are failing because of unrelated issue
> >> (changes to integer timestamps). We should probably look at 32bit machines
> >> first.
> > 
> > Don't think so - termite is ppc64 afaics, and the failure doesn't look
> > integer timestamp related (assert failure is clearly about this, and set
> > of changed commits *only* include slab related commits).
> > 
> 
> termite is ppc64 but with 4 byte pointer size according to configure so
> it might be related to that perhaps?

Uh, ok. I checked the --configure options, but not the actual configure
output (blame -ENOCOFEE and jetlag).  The output makes it fairly likely
that my StandardChunkHeader theory is valid, so I'll work on a patch to
clean that up.

Greetings,

Andres Freund