Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output output of base64
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output output of base64 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170223225537.GP20486@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output output of base64 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output output of base64
Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output output of base64 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 04:08:58PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Is there a reason we don't support base64 as a bytea_output output > > option, except that no one has implemented it? > > How about "we already have one too many bytea output formats"? > I don't think forcing code to try to support still another one > is a great thing ... especially not if it couldn't be reliably > distinguished from the hex format. Is there a reason we chose hex over base64? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: