Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170223182609.ymowqb7pj3m4vlbx@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:03:39PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > As I remember, WARM only allows > > > a single index-column change in the chain. Why are you seeing such a > > > large performance improvement? I would have thought it would be that > > > high if we allowed an unlimited number of index changes in the chain. > > > > The second update in a chain creates another non-warm-updated tuple, so > > the third update can be a warm update again, and so on. > > Right, before this patch they would be two independent HOT chains. No, they would be a regular update chain, not HOT updates. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: