Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?

Jim,

* Jim Nasby (Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com) wrote:
> On 2/22/17 12:29 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >On 2/22/17 10:14, Jim Nasby wrote:
> >>CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW tmv AS SELECT * FROM pg_subscription;
> >>SELECT 0
> >>
> >>IOW, you can create matviews that depend on any other
> >>table/view/matview, but right now if the matview includes certain items
> >>it will mysteriously end up empty post-restore.
> >
> >Yes, by that logic matview refresh should always be last.
>
> Patches for head attached.
>
> RLS was the first item added after DO_REFRESH_MATVIEW, which was
> added in 9.5. So if we want to treat this as a bug, they'd need to
> be patched as well, which is a simple matter of swapping 33 and 34.

Can you clarify what misbehavior there is with RLS that would warrent
this being a bug..?  I did consider where in the dump I thought policies
should go, though I may certainly have overlooked something.

Thanks!

Stephen