Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170121140302.GA18360@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] Checksums by default? (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Magnus Hagander (magnus@hagander.net) wrote: > Is it time to enable checksums by default, and give initdb a switch to turn > it off instead? Yes, please. We've already agreed to make changes to have a better user experience and ask those who really care about certain performance aspects to have to configure for performance instead (see: wal_level changes), I view this as being very much in that same vein. I know one argument in the past has been that we don't have a tool that can be used to check all of the checksums, but that's also changed now that pgBackRest supports verifying checksums during backups. I'm all for adding a tool to core to perform a validation too, of course, though it does make a lot of sense to validate checksums during backup since you're reading all the pages anyway. Thanks! Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: