Re: [HACKERS] Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170118222740.4jh5eyfkpyhkxscp@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function ("Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Karl O. Pinc wrote: > @@ -511,10 +519,16 @@ int > SysLogger_Start(void) > { > pid_t sysloggerPid; > - char *filename; > > + /* > + * Logging collector is not enabled. We don't know where messages are > + * logged. Remove outdated file holding the current log filenames. > + */ > if (!Logging_collector) > + { > + unlink(LOG_METAINFO_DATAFILE); > return 0; > + } I thought this part was odd -- I mean, why is SysLogger_Start() being called if the collector is not enabled? Turns out we do it and return early if not enabled. But not in all cases -- there is one callsite in postmaster.c that avoids the call if the collector is disabled. That needs to be changed if we want this to work reliably. I don't think the "abstract names" stuff is an improvement (just look at the quoting mess in ConfigureNamesString). I think we should do without that; at least as part of this patch. If you think there's code that can get better because of the idea, let's see it. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: