Re: [HACKERS] Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
От | Karl O. Pinc |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170118115659.0044c4e9@slate.meme.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function ("Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:08:23 -0600 "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com> wrote: > Hi Micheal, > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:26:43 -0600 > "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com> wrote: > > > > v26 patch attached which fixes this. > > I was glancing over the changes to the documentation > you made between the v22 and v25 If it were me I'd have the documentation mention that the pg_current_logfiles() result is supplied on a "best effort" basis and under rare conditions may be outdated. The sentence in the pg_current_logfles() docs which reads "pg_current_logfiles reflects the contents of the file current_logfiles." now carries little meaning because the current_logfiles docs no longer mention that the file content may be outdated. Regards, Karl <kop@meme.com> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: