Re: [HACKERS] Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (wasChanged SRF in targetlist handling)
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (wasChanged SRF in targetlist handling) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170116032952.z2re55hcfhzbkmrm@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (was Changed SRF in targetlist handling) (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (wasChanged SRF in targetlist handling)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-10-31 09:06:39 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2016-09-14 19:28:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > > On 2016-09-12 19:35:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Here's a draft patch that is just meant to investigate what the planner > > changes might look like if we do it in the pipelined-result way. > > Accordingly, I didn't touch the executor, but just had it emit regular > > Result nodes for SRF-execution steps. However, the SRFs are all > > guaranteed to appear at top level of their respective tlists, so that > > those Results could be replaced with something that works like > > nodeFunctionscan. > > > So I think we should continue investigating this way of doing things. > > I'll try to take a look at the executor end of it tomorrow. However > > I'm leaving Friday for a week's vacation, and may not have anything to > > show before that. > > Are you planning to work on the execution side of things? I otherwise > can take a stab... Doing so now. Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: