Re: [HACKERS] WARM and indirect indexes
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] WARM and indirect indexes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20170111153237.GC8584@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] WARM and indirect indexes (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 08:28:28AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 01/10/2017 09:25 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >I am not saying we shouldn't do it, but I am afraid that the complexity > >in figuring out when to use indirect indexes, combined with the number > >of users who will try them, really hurts its inclusion. > > > > > I think you're making this out to be far more complex than it really is. You > could argue the same about a great many features. Both of these features > have upsides and downsides. Right, and we do make such arguments --- what is your point? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: