Re: [HACKERS] make more use of RoleSpec struct
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] make more use of RoleSpec struct |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20161228152337.GI18360@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] make more use of RoleSpec struct (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] make more use of RoleSpec struct
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Here is a small cleanup patch to make more use of the RoleSpec > > struct/node throughout the parser to avoid casts and make the code more > > self-documenting. > > This makes sense to me. I started to do this at some point when I was > writing RoleSpec; eventually got annoyed about fixing the fallout (I was > working to get somebody else's patch committed) and went back to how it > is. Glad to see it done. > > The only functional issue might be the removal of the IsA() checks. If > we don't cast any Node before passing it to any of those functions, > there should be no problem because any misfeasance will be reported as a > compile-time warning. Perhaps it's worth adding IsA() checks in loops > such as the one in roleSpecsToIds(). Maybe inside of an Assert() though..? Thanks! Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: