Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API

On Fri, Dec  9, 2016 at 09:46:44AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> My own take on it is that the release notes are already a massive
> >> amount of work, and putting duplicative material in a bunch of other
> >> places isn't going to make things better, it'll just increase the
> >> maintenance burden.
> >
> > This would mean adding literally pages of material to the release notes.
> > In the past, folks have been very negative on anything which would make
> > the release notes longer.  Are you sure?
> 
> As that's a per-version information, that seems adapted to me. There
> could be as well in the release notes a link to the portion of the
> docs holding this manual. Definitely this should be self-contained in
> the docs, and not mention the wiki. My 2c.

Yes, that is the usual approach.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +