Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files?
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20161113171136.ljweowqyxct4vwye@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-11-13 11:23:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > On 2016-11-13 00:20:22 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> Then we're not very far away from just using CREATE FUNCTION SQL commands. > > > Well, those do a lot of syscache lookups, which in turn do lookups for > > functions... > > We can't use CREATE FUNCTION as the representation in the .bki file, > because of the circularities involved (you can't fill pg_proc before > pg_type nor vice versa). But I think Peter was suggesting that the > input to the bki-generator script could look like CREATE commands. > That's true, but I fear it would greatly increase the complexity > of the script for not much benefit. It'd also be very pg_proc specific, which isn't where I think this should go.. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: