Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the way that LWLocks for extensions are allocated.
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the way that LWLocks for extensions are allocated. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20161112163508.5uqlaozeyr3l56ae@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the way that LWLocks for extensions are allocated. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the way that LWLocks for extensions are allocated.
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the way that LWLocks for extensions are allocated. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-11-12 11:30:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > Committed after simplifying the Makefile. > > While I have no particular objection to adding these tests, the > commit log's claim that this will improve buildfarm testing is > quite wrong. The buildfarm runs "make installcheck" not > "make check" in contrib. Gah. It was more aimed at the coverage stuff, but that might work the same. Alvaro? > which is a rather blatant waste of cycles. I would suggest an explicit > do-nothing installcheck rule rather than the hack you came up with here. I had that at first, but that generates a warning about overwriting the makefile target - which afaics cannot be fixed. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: