Re: Avoiding pin scan during btree vacuum
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Avoiding pin scan during btree vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20161019223047.dcgqqjiiymafyqod@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Avoiding pin scan during btree vacuum (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Avoiding pin scan during btree vacuum
Re: Avoiding pin scan during btree vacuum |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> This seems like a might subtle thing to backpatch. If we really want to > >> go there, ISTM that the relevant code should stew in an unreleased > >> branch for a while, before being backpatched. > > > > I'm definitely -1 on back-patching such a thing. Put it in HEAD for > > awhile. If it survives six months or so then we could discuss it again. > > I agree with Tom. Okay, several months have passed with this in the development branch and now seems a good time to backpatch this all the way back to 9.4. Any objections? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: