Re: Hash Indexes
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hash Indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20161018174635.qgndqdbz5piiwm72@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hash Indexes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-10-18 13:38:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I have implemented this idea and it works for MVCC scans. However, I > >> think this might not work for non-MVCC scans. Consider a case where > >> in Process-1, hash scan has returned one row and before it could check > >> it's validity in heap, vacuum marks that tuple as dead and removed the > >> entry from heap and some new tuple has been placed at that offset in > >> heap. > > > Oops, that's bad. > > Do we care? Under what circumstances would a hash index be used for a > non-MVCC scan? Uniqueness checks, are the most important one that comes to mind. Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: