Re: pgbench vs. wait events
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgbench vs. wait events |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20161010134444.GA24183@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pgbench vs. wait events (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgbench vs. wait events
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 02:38:56PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > Hi, > > I decided to do some testing on hydra (IBM-provided community > resource, POWER, 16 cores/64 threads, kernel 3.2.6-3.fc16.ppc64) using > the newly-enhanced wait event stuff to try to get an idea of what > we're waiting for during pgbench. I did 30-minute pgbench runs with > various configurations, but all had max_connections = 200, > shared_buffers = 8GB, maintenance_work_mem = 4GB, synchronous_commit = > off, checkpoint_timeout = 15min, checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9, > log_line_prefix = '%t [%p] ', max_wal_size = 40GB, log_checkpoints = > on. During each run, I ran this psql script in another window and > captured the output: This is a great study that shows how the new instrumentation has given us a new window into performance. I am frankly surprised we got as far as we did in finding performance bottlenecks before we had this instrumentation. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: