Re: Hash Indexes
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hash Indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160915142309.yisxr6vcdavilt2s@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Hash Indexes (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hash Indexes
Re: Hash Indexes |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2016-05-10 17:39:22 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > For making hash indexes usable in production systems, we need to improve > its concurrency and make them crash-safe by WAL logging them. One earlier question about this is whether that is actually a worthwhile goal. Are the speed and space benefits big enough in the general case? Could those benefits not be achieved in a more maintainable manner by adding a layer that uses a btree over hash(columns), and adds appropriate rechecks after heap scans? Note that I'm not saying that hash indexes are not worthwhile, I'm just doubtful that question has been explored sufficiently. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: