Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160822174734.kziqfc3i4gix2g7b@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-08-22 13:41:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: > >> But what about the best case? If we create a scenario where there are > >> no open read-write transactions at all and (somehow) lots and lots of > >> ProcArrayLock contention, how much does this help? > > > > I ran some quick pgbench tests on my laptop, but didn't see any meaningful > > benefit. I think the best I could see is about 5% speedup, when running > > "pgbench -S", with 900 idle connections sitting in the background. On the > > positive side, I didn't see much slowdown either. (Sorry, I didn't record > > the details of those tests, as I was testing many different options and I > > didn't see a clear difference either way.) > > That's not very exciting. I think it's neither exciting nor worrying - the benefit of the pgproc batch clearing itself wasn't apparent on small hardware either...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: