Re: patch proposal
| От | Stephen Frost |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: patch proposal |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20160817132722.GT4028@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: patch proposal (Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: patch proposal
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Venkata, * Venkata B Nagothi (nag1010@gmail.com) wrote: > Agreed. Additional option like "pause" would. As long as there is an option > to ensure following happens if the recovery target is not reached - > > a) PG pauses the recovery at the end of the WAL > b) Generates a warning in the log file saying that recovery target point > is not reached (there is a patch being worked upon on by Thom on this) > c) Does not open-up the database exiting from the recovery process by > giving room to resume the replay of WALs One thing to consider is just how different this is from simply bringing PG up as a warm standby instead, with the warning added to indicate if the recovery point wasn't reached. Thanks! Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: