Re: regression test for extended query protocol
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: regression test for extended query protocol |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160810203305.GA625260@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: regression test for extended query protocol (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: regression test for extended query protocol
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > If somebody had some spare time to devote to this, I would suggest to > > implement something in core that can be used to specify a list of > > commands to run, and a list of files-to-be-saved-in-bf-log emitted by > > each command. We could have one such base file in the core repo that > > specifies some tests to run (such as "make -C src/test/recovery check"), > > and an additional file can be given by buildfarm animals to run custom > > tests, without having to write BF modules for each thing. With that, > > pgsql committers could simply add a new test to be run by all buildfarm > > animals by adding it to the list in core. > > Do you think about using a special makefile target to run those > commands, say in src/test? At the end we are going to need to patch > the buildfarm client code at least once, at least that would be worth > it in the long term.. Sure. Some time ago I proposed something like a JSON file, something like test_foo => { "command" : "make -C src/test/blah check", "save_output" : [ "src/test/blah/server.log", "src/test/blah/regress*.log"] } as I recall, Andrew said that he didn't like JSON very much but that the idea made sense to him. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: