Re: 9.6 phrase search distance specification
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.6 phrase search distance specification |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160809180703.GB9952@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.6 phrase search distance specification (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 01:58:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Does anyone know why the phrase distance "<3>" was changed from "at most > > three tokens away" to "exactly three tokens away"? > > So that it would correctly support phraseto_tsquery's use of the operator > to represent omitted words (stopwords) in a phrase. > > I think there's probably some use in also providing an operator that does > "at most this many tokens away", but Oleg/Teodor were evidently less > excited, because they didn't take the time to do it. > > The thread where this change was discussed is > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/c19fcfec308e6ccd952cdde9e648b505%40mail.gmail.com > > see particularly > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/11252.1465422251%40sss.pgh.pa.us Ah, I know it was discussed somewhere. Thanks, the phraseto_tsquery tie-in was what I forgot. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: