Re: fun fact about temp tables
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fun fact about temp tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160805161814.GM18305@crankycanuck.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fun fact about temp tables (Grigory Smolkin <g.smolkin@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: fun fact about temp tables
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 06:02:08PM +0300, Grigory Smolkin wrote: > But it`s temporary table so it`s equal to saying 'I don`t care about this > data' and I can get 'out of disk space' regardless of using temporary > tables. > > What are we winning here? Surely, that the transaction operates in a predictable way? A temp table doesn't say, "I don't care about this data," it says, "I don't care about this data over the long haul." I've had lots of data go through temp tables that I really really wanted to get into some other place later, and it'd suck if the transaction failed half way through because it turns out there's nowhere to put the data I've just staged. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@crankycanuck.ca
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: