Re: Pgbench performance tuning?
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pgbench performance tuning? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160804182037.nqsqix4yr7abdjop@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Pgbench performance tuning? (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-08-04 19:15:43 +0100, Greg Stark wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > What's the config? Version? What activity does pidstat -d -l indicate? > > How much WAL was generated? > > I know the specifics matter but I was also trying to avoid dumping too > much into the email. > > The shared buffers is set to 16384 (128MB). Otherwise it's a default > config (For 9.4 and before I set checkpoint_segments to 32 as well). Well, with 128MB I don't find that a very surprising result. You're going to push data out to disk constantly. Given the averaged random access pattern of pgbench that's not really something that interesting. > Never seen pidstat before but pidstat -d looks like it prints very > similar output to the iostat output I was gathering already. There's > nothing else running on the machine. The question is which backends are doing the IO. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: