Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty()
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160801185223.GE28246@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 02:48:55PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 7/30/16 2:16 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > The second patch does what Tom suggests above by outputting only "KB", > > and it supports "kB" for backward compatibility. What it doesn't do is > > to allow arbitrary case, which I think would be a step backward. The > > second patch actually does match the JEDEC standard, except for allowing > > "kB". > > If we're going to make changes, why not bite the bullet and output KiB? > > I have never heard of JEDEC, so I'm less inclined to accept their > "standard" at this point. I already address this. While I have never heard of JEDEC either, I have seen KB, and have never seen KiB, hence my argument that KiB would lead to more confusion than we have now. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: