Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160711214947.GO4028@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > > I agree with removing the source code field, though I did like the > > suggestion mentioned elsewhere for having it shown when it's just a C > > symbol but not otherwise. If we can find a way to have the C symbol > > shown when it's a C or internal function, I'm fine with that, but the > > source code field having entier pl/sql and pl/pgsql functions in it > > doesn't work and \sf should be used instead. > > It would certainly be easy enough to do that, as long as you don't mind > hard-wiring into psql the knowledge that "internal" and "C" are the > languages to show prosrc for. "Source code" would no longer be a very > appropriate column name, though it already was not for these cases. > I'd be inclined to call it "Internal name" instead. That would certainly work for me. Thanks! Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: