Re: Stored procedure version control
От | Karsten Hilbert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Stored procedure version control |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160702121934.GA21879@hermes.hilbert.loc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Stored procedure version control (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 09:16:49AM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote: > It's not really necessary to create version down scripts. In five > years of managing complex database environments we've never had to > roll a version back and likely never will; in the event of a disaster > it's probably better to restore from backup anyways. Also, a very robust approach to rollback is to clone the existing databse before upgrading the schema (if feasible due to size). This is the approach GNUmed uses - migration scripts are up only, as many of them as possible are idempotent, and we clone the existing database into a new one before the upgrade is run. That way, users can go back to the previous database immediately anytime and reattempt the upgrade when convenient. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: