Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160629232009.GA216999@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki > <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > >> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > >> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier > >> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 11:37 AM > >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> > >> wrote: > >> > It might be worth testing that out and adding an initdb startup > >> > flag to create the directory, since initdb is such a PITA to > >> > debug. > >> > >> I was more thinking about putting that under -DDEBUG for example. > > > > I think just the existing option -d (--debug) and/or -n (--no-clean) > > would be OK. > > If the majority thinks that an option switch is more adapted, I won't > fight it strongly. Just please let's not mess up with the behavior of > the existing options. I think creating crashdumps/ when both -d and -n are specified is a bit odd but reasonable. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: