Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160629175041.GA121670@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Michael Paquier wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Alvaro Herrera > >> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > >> > I have already edited the patch following some of these ideas. Will > >> > post a new version later. > >> > >> Cool, thanks. > > > > Here it is. I found it was annoying to maintain the function return > > tupdesc in two places (pg_proc.h and the function code itself), so I > > changed that too. > > ISTM that pg_stat_wal_receiver can return the security-sensitive fields > if it's viewed before walreceiver overwrites the conninfo in the shared memory > with the obfuscated one. Hmm, ouch. Maybe we can set a flag once the conninfo has been obfuscated, and put the function to sleep until the flag is set. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: