Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Noah Misch
Тема Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Дата
Msg-id 20160615063736.GA1030423@tornado.leadboat.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:50:33AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> In short, this test doesn't serve it's purpose which is to generate an
> error from worker.

That's bad.  Thanks for figuring out the problem.

> do $$begin
>   Perform stringu1::int2 from tenk1 where unique1 = 1;
> end$$;
> 
> ERROR:  invalid input syntax for integer: "BAAAAA"
> CONTEXT:  parallel worker, PID 4460
> SQL statement "SELECT stringu1::int2 from tenk1 where unique1 = 1"
> PL/pgSQL function inline_code_block line 2 at PERFORM
> 
> Considering above analysis is correct, we have below options:
> a. Modify the test such that it actually generates an error and to hide the
> context, we can exception block and raise some generic error.
> b. Modify the test such that it actually generates an error and to hide the
> context, we can use force_parallel_mode = regress;

Either of those sounds okay.  No need to raise a generic error; one can raise
SQLERRM to keep the main message and not the context.  I lean toward (a) so we
have nonzero test coverage of force_parallel_mode=on.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reviewing freeze map code