Re: effective_io_concurrency in 9.6beta
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: effective_io_concurrency in 9.6beta |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160524183438.GA443623@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: effective_io_concurrency in 9.6beta (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: effective_io_concurrency in 9.6beta
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes: > > commit 1aba62ec made zero be an illegal value for effective_io_concurrency. > > i think this was an accident. If not, then the sample postgresql.conf > > (at least) needs to be updated. > > It looks like the problem is that the new range check > > + /* This range check shouldn't fail, but let's be paranoid */ > + return (new_prefetch_pages > 0.0 && new_prefetch_pages < (double) INT_MAX); > > should be testing for >= 0.0 not > 0.0. Hmm, yeah, it looks like that's it. Will fix. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: