Re: 9.4 failure on skink in _bt_newroot/XLogCheckBuffer

Hi tom,

On 2016-05-21 17:18:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > The valgrind animal just reported a large object related failure on 9.4:
> 
> The proximate cause seems to be that _bt_newroot isn't bothering to
> fill the buffer_std field here:
> 
>         /* Make a full-page image of the left child if needed */
>         rdata[2].data = NULL;
>         rdata[2].len = 0;
>         rdata[2].buffer = lbuf;
>         rdata[2].next = NULL;
> 
> which is indeed an actual bug, but the only consequence would be poor
> compression of the full-page image (if the value chanced to be zero),
> so it's not much of a problem.

Thanks for fixing that one!


> What remains unclear is how come this only fails once in a blue moon.
> Seems like any valgrind run of the regression tests should have caught it.

Looks like a timing issue. The relevant access to the uninitialized
buffer_std field only happens whenif (*lsn <= RedoRecPtr){
which presumably is not that likely to be hit.  Even under valgrind the
individual tests are likely to finish below a checkpoint timeout.

Greetings,

Andres Freund