Re: status/timeline of pglogical?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160513175947.GA3267@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? (Martín Marqués <martin@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:48:39PM -0300, Martín Marqués wrote: > El 12/05/16 a las 12:26, Magnus Hagander escribió: > > Can it be made to work? Sure. But I definitely agree with Robert that we > > need "real" in place upgrades at some point. > > It would be a neat feature. The question is if there will be such a > solution and if it will be or not reliable. My point is that it will require major changes/testing for _every_ major release because there would be substantial upgrade-only code needed for every major release. This is not true for pg_upgrade, and avoiding this is part of its design. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: