Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20160513162812.GC3266@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy]
9.6 -> 10.0
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:12:23AM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote: > There was no disrespect intended. I was trying to push forth an idea that > multi-company team collaboration is better for the community than single > company team collaboration. I will stand by that assertion. Uh, we are already doing that. EDB and NTT are working on FDWs and sharding, PostgresPro and someone else is working on a transaction manager, and EDB and 2nd Quadrant worked on parallelism. What is the problem you are trying to solve? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: