Re: When should be advocate external projects?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: When should be advocate external projects? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160512202437.GF2632@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: When should be advocate external projects? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: When should be advocate external projects?
Re: When should be advocate external projects? |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:44:17AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > That's basically what the software catalogue does, isn't it? It needs to be > > revamped to be more user friendly, and more promoted, but as a basis? > > Sure, that kind of idea. I'd forgotten we had that. I think that we > should go to a format with just one line for each piece of software, > though, instead of a big box. And try to get it all one one page. > And remove all of the proprietary products or put them in a separate > section. And include only stuff that's actually reasonably widely > used. > > Maybe we should just go stand up a wiki page to start. What's in the > software catalog right now looks useless to me. I think our wiki page that lists all the FDWs is great, so why can't we do this for other external software? https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Foreign_data_wrappers -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: