Re: status/timeline of pglogical?

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:36:24PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 11 May 2016 at 23:16, Vik Fearing <vik@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
>
>     On 05/12/2016 12:13 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>     > On 05/11/2016 03:06 PM, Vik Fearing wrote:
>     >> On 05/11/2016 04:25 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>     >>> We have a long standing practice of not promoting external
>     >>> tools/utilities/add-ons in docs or with releases
>     >>
>     >> No we don't.  See 092c38a and f02b14f.
>     >
>     > For those that don't git everyday, is there a link to this?
>
>     They're the creation and an update of the last paragraph on this page:
>     http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/logfile-maintenance.html
>
>     It was added in 2010 by Bruce and updated in 2013 by Peter Eisentraut.
>
>
> Plus also these references to pgAdmin, all present since at least 9.1
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/tutorial-accessdb.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/plpgsql-development-tips.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/external-admin-tools.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/adminpack.html 
>
> "There are several administration tools available for PostgreSQL. The most
> popular is pgAdmin III, and there are several commercially available ones as
> well."

I encourage mentioning external tools in the right context --- we need
more of that.  I think the question is whether a beta announcement is
the right place for external tool announcements.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+                     Ancient Roman grave inscription +