Re: ALTER TABLE lock downgrades have broken pg_upgrade
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER TABLE lock downgrades have broken pg_upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160511010112.GH22756@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER TABLE lock downgrades have broken pg_upgrade (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 03:32:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > I think possibly the easiest fix for this is to have pg_upgrade, > > instead of RESETting a nonexistent option, RESET something that's > > still considered to require AccessExclusiveLock. "user_catalog_table" > > would work, looks like; though I'd want to annotate its entry in > > reloptions.c to warn people away from downgrading its lock level. > > I tried fixing it like that. The alternate RESET target had behaved as > expected when I'd tested by hand, but in pg_upgrade it still fails, > only now with > > Creating newly-required TOAST tables SQL command failed > ALTER TABLE "public"."i_need_a_toast_table" RESET (user_catalog_table); > ERROR: pg_type OID value not set when in binary upgrade mode I think this means that the ALTER TABLE RESET is adding or potentially adding a pg_type row, and no one called binary_upgrade_set_next_pg_type_oid(). -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: