Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160429154403.GF31894@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 (Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy]
9.6 -> 10.0
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:07:04PM +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > Our roadmap http://www.postgresql.org/developer/roadmap/ is the problem. We > don't have clear roadmap and that's why we cannot plan future feature full > release. There are several postgres-centric companies, which have most of > developers, who do all major contributions. All these companies has their > roadmaps, but not the community. I would be concerned if company roadmaps overtly affected the community roadmap. In general, I find company roadmaps to be very short-sighted and quickly changed based on the demands of specific users/customers --- something we don't want to imitate. We do want company roadmaps to affect the community roadmap, but in a healthy, long-term way, and I think, in general, that is happening. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: