Re: Materialized views vs. primary keys
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Materialized views vs. primary keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160405234825.GC8966@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Materialized views vs. primary keys (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Materialized views vs. primary keys
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:56PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:50 PM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote: > > Is there a reason other than lack of tuits for this restriction? > > "this" lacks an antecedent. Try to put a primary key on a materialized view, for example: CREATE TABLE foo(id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, t text); CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW bar AS SELECT * FROM foo; REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW bar; ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW bar ADD PRIMARY KEY(id); At that last step, you get an error that bar is not a table. You get an identical error with the hoary old trick of ALTER TABLE bar ADD PRIMARY KEY(id); This lack prevents things that depend on primary keys (foreign keys, logical replication, etc.) from operating on the materialized views. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: