Re: [PROPOSAL] Client Log Output Filtering

David Steele wrote:
> On 3/29/16 10:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> >Repurposing COMMERROR is definitely starting to seem like a low-impact
> >solution compared to these others.  Under what circumstances would you
> >be wanting hide-from-client with an elevel different from LOG, anyway?
> 
> In pgaudit the log level for audit messages is user configurable but this
> was mostly added for testing purposes on the client side.  I don't think it
> would be a big deal to force the level to LOG when client output is
> suppressed.

So audit records would use COMMERROR?  That sounds really bad to me.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services