Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Дата
Msg-id 20160328153843.GA750908@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-03-28 15:46:43 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:

> > @@ -932,8 +936,13 @@ ReadBuffer_common(SMgrRelation smgr, cha
> >  
> >      if (isLocalBuf)
> >      {
> > -        /* Only need to adjust flags */
> > -        bufHdr->flags |= BM_VALID;
> > +        /*
> > +         * Only need to adjust flags.  Since it's local buffer, there is no
> > +         * concurrency.  We assume read/write pair to be cheaper than atomic OR.
> > +         */
> > +        uint32 state = pg_atomic_read_u32(&bufHdr->state);
> > +        state |= BM_VALID;
> > +        pg_atomic_write_u32(&bufHdr->state, state);
> 
> I'm not a fan of repeating that comment in multiple places. Hm.

Perhaps a set of macros should be offered that do "read, set some flag,
write".  Then the comments can be attached to the macro instead of to
each callsite.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Draft release notes for next week's releases
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: multivariate statistics v14