* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On 10 March 2016 at 06:53, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> > > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > > > Robert Haas wrote:
> > > >> I'm pretty meh about the whole idea of this function, though,
> > > >> actually, and I don't see a single clear +1 vote for this
> > > >> functionality upthread. (Apologies if I've missed one.) In the
> > > >> absence of a few of those, I recommend we reject this.
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > >
> > > I'm meh for this patch.
> >
> > "meh" == +1
> >
> > I thought it meant -1
>
> I would say that "meh" is +0, actually. So the the tally is a small
> positive number -- not great, but seems enough to press forward unless
> we get more -1 votes.
I'm +1 on this also, for my part.
Thanks!
Stephen