Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
Дата
Msg-id 20160309170755.GA977705@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:

> > Without setting max_parallel_degree, it works fine and generate the
> > appropriate results.  Here the issue seems to be that the code in
> > grouping_planner doesn't apply the required PathTarget to Path below Gather
> > Path due to which when we generate target list for scan plan,
> 
> Yeah, fixed.  I had assumed that the existing coding in create_gather_plan
> was OK, because it looked like it was right for a non-projecting node.
> But actually Gather can project (why though?), so it's not right.

This looks related:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoai9Ruhwk61110rY4cNAzoO6npsFEOaEKjM7Zz8i3evHg%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Alter or rename enum value
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Alter or rename enum value