Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160309032903.GA950702@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Is there anything we can do to short-circuit the wait in the case that > > replication happens promptly? A one-minute wait would be acceptable we > > terminate it early by checking every second. > > After sleeping (best debugger ever) on that, actually a way popped up > in my mind, and I propose the attached, which refactors a bit 005 and > checks that the LSN position of master has been applied on standby > after at least the delay wanted. A maximum delay of 90s is authorized, > like poll_query_until. Hmm, okay, that's great. A question: what happens if the test itself is slow and the servers are fast, and the test doesn't manage to run two iterations before the two seconds have elapsed? This may happen on overloaded or slow servers, if you're unlucky. I don't have any ideas on ensuring that we don't apply earlier than the given period at the moment. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: