Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
Дата
Msg-id 20160301190244.GA14516@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding  (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar  1, 2016 at 07:56:58PM +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> Note that I am not saying that other discussed approaches are any
> better, I am saying that we should know approximately what we
> actually want and not just beat FDWs with a hammer and hope sharding
> will eventually emerge and call that the plan.

I will say it again --- FDWs are the only sharding method I can think of
that has a chance of being accepted into Postgres core.  It is a plan,
and if it fails, it fails.  If is succeeds, that's good.  What more do
you want me to say?  I know of no other way to answer the questions you
asked above.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription                             +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reduce lock levels others reloptions in ALTER TABLE
Следующее
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [REVIEW]: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol