Re: Confusing with commit time usage in logical decoding
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Confusing with commit time usage in logical decoding |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160301171328.GA357017@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Confusing with commit time usage in logical decoding (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Petr Jelinek wrote: > On 01/03/16 17:57, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >Artur Zakirov wrote: > >>Hello, Andres > >> > >>You have introduced a large replication progress tracking infrastructure > >>last year. And there is a problem described at the link in the quote below. > >> > >>Attached patch fix this issue. Is this patch correct? I will be grateful if > >>it is and if it will be committed. > > > >AFAICS this is clearly a bug introduced in 5aa235042: > > > > /* replay actions of all transaction + subtransactions in order */ > > ReorderBufferCommit(ctx->reorder, xid, buf->origptr, buf->endptr, > >- parsed->xact_time); > >+ commit_time, origin_id, origin_lsn); > > } > > > > Well yeah but the commit_time is set few lines above as Artur pointed out, I > think the proposed fix is correct one. Err, yes, that's exactly what I am saying. Sorry for being unclear. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: