Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160301153742.GA5820@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:19:45AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > > Two reasons: > > 1. There is no ideal implementation of DTM which will fit all possible needs > > and be efficient for all clusters. > > Hmm, what is the reasoning behind that statement? I mean, it is > certainly true that there are some places where we have decided that > one-size-fits-all is not the right approach. Indexing, for example. Uh, is that even true of indexing? While the plug-in nature of indexing allows for easier development and testing, does anyone create plug-in indexing that isn't shipped by us? I thought WAL support was something that prevented external indexing solutions from working. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: